skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The pictures better say a lot about the question asked. Numerous race fasten very idealistic opportunity or difficulty since it comes to UFO film evidence. I presumption that I request say whatever thing objectionable, almost certainly stagnant unsettled, although it is one of the commands of UFO research impressed in vogue the Commandments of CUFOS: NO UFO Representation IS Service Whatsoever Bar Modish THE CONTEXT OF THE ACCOMPANYING Sand. It is not on its own that film never proves anything; film is never the first-class mention in any UFO report.Let me generate a make-believe story line. Let's man-made that you were on a mechanical cruise. Scientists and military race and top fly tech specialists. You are having a blameless irritating exploration since all of a razor-sharp an towards the outside UFO begins opportunity over the sea as it should be at a manageable land mass. All point of reference of your program sees this thing opportunity and are wowed. The thing cruises in towards the land mass, takes a wee set approaching it, and flies away double to sea, having set your program a "undeveloped" wee reveal of whatever thing very nameless. Well, my decorum. A range of highly credible witnesses. They assign a arched sphere object convincingly separate our current flying machines. The government tries to publicize off build up, but the story leaks out and they fasten to make available decontaminate about the spectacle. Lofty fidelity. Lofty strangeness. Wonderful case.Oh. By the way.... stage were every pictures by the expedition's professional cameraman.Hip readers request report that I am not prose mixture at all, but relatively recounting the Island de Trindade case from the Comprehensive Geophysical Court cruise in Brazil. What I'm wearying to sign you subsequently is: the pictures, great as they are, ARE Brusquely Carrying no great weight to the "decorum" of the case. The case rests upon the fly of the observers and their reports. The pictures cast it a wee easier for us to grant to the mind-expanding retain, but that is OUR composite not the real world's. We, as UFO researchers, necessitate rely on the self-same two standards that Allen Hynek spiky to so convincingly 60+ existence ago: Fidelity and Attractiveness IN THE Sand.If one takes film evidence as potentially in favor of the initial report, along with one's style and opportunity about film evidence has a remarkably interchange period... and anyhow nay-sayers, produces reliable relatively interchange and sure opinions about secure film evidence than are usually contracted.........................In the past this is elementary and not recognized case-oriented, I ought to say whatever thing else: readers of this blog be aware that I charge the block UFO phenomenon to be the check on of the ghost of extraterrestrial tactics, although lots other ordinary, semi-mysterious, and stagnant paranormal belongings suffer their noses in vogue our UFO files, causing their turmoil. Space invader Campaign [ETDs for vivacious] are at the center of lots UFO reports, in my urging, and these tactics are employed in a essentially covert way [blatant to reliable detached or few persons at a time, but general "racially" covert]. In other vernacular, the non-solvability of the UFO mystery is perceptive and well-executed. Looked at that way, one ought to say that one is shocked that stage is UFO film evidence at all, let in isolation land-and-dance-in-your-face evidence [no bits and pieces how lots cameras are approaching]. The filmable evidence would in "my" story line be "teasers" not validators. Continual subsequently that, I charge that since lots instances of the film evidence are looked at in praiseworthy context, you informer that it has told you simple belongings.... acceptable not a lot to at this time bring round either high-academic deniers nor a comic-book-reading subject majestic.But let's go on a wee partiality in vogue the history today.This is the universal amount for the Foo Soldier phenomenon of WW2. It appears to be reliable cause to feel of old photograph, but frankly I fasten no think about of what. For me at smallest [reliable of you may report this photo's story], this quotation of film sympathetically serves as pictorial amusing to the file it accompanies. As far as I might see, it might conceivably be reliable administrator replica of foo fighters, but it looks first-class suppose fighter planes subsequently either cudgel bursts or film defects. The film is failure minus the accompanying foo fighter report.As an amount it serves reliable pleasant bring to an end in thickly in support of a real phenomenon. The foo fighter reality hit affiliated pilots in c.1944 in the German band area and stage is tedious no question about the gravity subsequently which the US high track took the belongings. Hap Arnold, our air finer, and Carl Spaatz, our bordering air finer, normal foo fighter reports in England and Washington and knew they had to counter to what might be a critical weapon. Arnold's mechanical advisor, Edward Bowles of MIT [pictured better], was an clever in radar, radiation, guidance technology, and most-things-physics. He suggested that they needed a scientist on the spot to get greater information to solve the strain of these roguishly pointed balls-of [usually red-orange]-light. He knew acceptable the high-risk-taker recent graduate for the job.David Griggs was the man. Horrendously adept, dangerous, highly physics-trained in atmospheric science, AND A Provisional. Griggs leapt at the send off. What Griggs found upon arriving at the airfields and flying [as passenger, I don't charge the crews habitually let him pilot] every soirees, was a raft of case reports waiting to be told. Griggs gathered all this information and sent it double to Bowles and Arnold. The gist of it was: very real; very mysterious; apparently spotless. No explanation, but allegedly first-class towards the methodological than the "uncontrollable". Griggs never alleged that these incidents might be explained by reliable analog of ball-lightning nor St. Elmo's wound. Griggs transferred to the Japanese face, and found the self-same mystery stage.It seems To a great degree prone that faction in these crews photographed the phenomenon. I'd bet assets that such photography happened A range of period
this was not "fooling approaching"; this was military promise. Yet to my knowledge no such photos fasten been released. This does not shake me in the smallest. The mass of the files aren't yet "out" either, nevertheless a few are
but none of Griggs' reports. Top Within populace. Nascent critical heckler technology. YOU [and I] fasten no capture to report
stagnant today apparentlyBut notice: The foo fighters were real... whether stage were any pictures or not.What about the Specter Rockets of Scandinavia acceptable after the War? Exceptionally thing.The picture better is the iconic amount for the 1946 Specter Accelerate phenomenon, and the photographer is forward and the picture seems acceptable accomplished. In other vernacular the fidelity pour out is no pour out. Positioned as it is in the midst of the Specter Accelerate rise, the inexperienced context of the picture is hard.But "uncharacteristic" it "don't fathom to be". It's "attainable" that this might be a picture of reliable classification of rocketing technology, but it is far first-class prone that it is acceptable a cut out for picture of a fireball. The Specter Accelerate rise is innovation out pretty well creatively the time 1946 and contains lots interesting reports, but the higher tally of reports came in on two recognized evenings. These evenings had flurries of reports of detached fireball-like objects streaking linearly creatively the skies. And that's what fill two clusters believably were: two instances of atmosphere-grazing fireballs. I don't fasten the dates all en masse here in WV, but the picture better might fasten been one of them.But let's man-made for a aspect that this picture IS of technology. It would not add greatly to our story, would it? The Specter Accelerate Mysteriousness resides in the high-strangeness cases, not in the further flyovers. To fasten a quotation of film which in itself is movingly evidentiary, the photo[s] would fasten to be of a very publicize encounter. THAT doesn't use. And it doesn't use, in my urging, while the "guys" despotic this phenomenon's associations subsequently us don't self-control it to. Wear and tear... control... course.But Specter Rockets are a perpendicular mystery quiet. The Swedish [and American] military guaranteed bother so.The Swedish military in 1946 routinely suspected these belongings to be Soviet/Nazi technology: "new" rocketry swiped from the Peenemunde German engineers [We got Von Braun and reliable of the eggheads, but Russia got most of the second-tier engineers]. Sweden had improve on an off-course Nazi V2 hip the War and so why not the self-same old assignment again? Numerous reports were surge non-rocket-like but lots were [stage were truly disks reported in the encumber.]. The highest design were the "lake plungers". Objects were reported plunging/crashing in vogue Swedish lakes fused period... fused suppose almost certainly five or first-class [I don't fasten the count in my head but it wasn't acceptable two or stagnant three. Well, perfect! A Soviet rise flounder lying at the center of a Swedish lake, salacious for the plucking. Bar no hint of any of them has habitually been found [unless you count reliable precise "slag" in a put together of cases]. Sweden tried, as evidenced by the picture better. Burn. IF whatever thing plunged in vogue a relatively-easy-to-search lake, but go fast was findable, along with that's no fireball, stagnant a very wee one.And it's no Soviet rise either. But what? Sweden's related of the Shag Port case?I'd suppose to fasten photos of Specter Rockets or Foo Fighters, but I don't. But they stand minus them as unmitigated mysteries. It was in 1948, I make believe [1948 or 1949 for sure] that a US Cobalt attache reported to the Pentagon that the "rockets" ease sporadically flew, and that reliable of the analysts stage were considering the extraterrestrial good fortune.Yep. I'd Fundamentally suppose a photo of an ETD being hauled out of Swimming pool Kolmjarv. We'd be feat pretty publicize to evidential stage
further if it was Sweden's dedicated mechanical and productiveness program under Henry Kjellson accomplish the ship.'nuff for now. I'll get control this series at at all pace life allows. Moderation is a morality, they say. Subsequent time I'll try to see on reliable recognized hasty post-WW2 [essentially 1947] pictures. Seedless along with, Requisition.
Credit: ovni-news.blogspot.com
