Sunday, November 9, 2014
Ufo Alert Police Officer Sees Aliens At Crop Circle
Labels: aliens, ufo 2, ufo hunters wiki
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Ufo Sighting In South Jordan Utah On February 22Nd 2015 Looked Like Star But Changed Directions Constantly
is THAT?!". As soon as she started to look over to where it was, it headed toward the horizon in a straight line and slowly disappeared. But she didn't see it in time anyway. She said that when I had called out to her she saw a flash in the sky to the north and wasn't sure what it was. Soon after the incident, the clouds moved in and covered everything. Didn't see anything else after that. I'd guess the speed of the object was anywhere between mach 2 and 3 or maybe faster, assuming it was out in space or at least really high up in the atmosphere. I've seen jets go mach 1 and they wouldn't be able to keep up with this object. I'm not sure how it changed direction so often. That's the thing that made me come here to report it. Most objects I see in the sky are explainable but this one is one of those that I can't explain away.
UFO News
UFO News on Facebook
Eviland
News Just For You
Reference: aliens-are-friends.blogspot.com
Labels: aliens, ufology, warp-drive
Friday, November 7, 2014
Paul Leblond Sea Monsters
I found this on a photo search yesterday and I found it EXTREMELY interesting.
IDENTIFYING THE UNIDENTIFIABLE
July 27, 2012
"THE THREE TYPES OF UNIDENTIFIED SEA CREATURES DESCRIBED BY DR. PAUL LEBLOND. (LINDA GODFREY)"
Ancient myths paint unknown sea creatures as true monsters, or beings that combine characteristics of different species and that may possess supernatural powers. But the modern view of sea"monsters" is usually that they are unknown, natural animals. But what kind of animal are they? Reptile? Amphibian? Mammal? Some researchers have analyzed as many eyewitness accounts as possible and created models that most closely match all these descriptions.
The task itself is monstrous, given the many stories reported over the years by hundreds of people in all types of weather and light conditions, from varied distances and points of view. Creatures that resemble giant whales, squid, or other known ocean dwellers demand separate categories. And those that most closely fit the public's mental image of sea monsters have been described with many combinations of long necks, "humps," flippers, headsranging from turtle-like to horse-like, lengths from 20 to over 100 feet, and skin both scaled and smooth. Yet most classifiers have managed to boil them down into some basic subtypes.
In 1963 French zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans wrote a classic book, In the Wake of the Sea Serpents, that attempted to place sightings from around the world into nine categories: long-necked, merhorse, many humped, super-otters, many-finned, super-eels, marine saurians, yellow- bellies, and fathers-of-all-the-turtles. While it is now alleged that Heuvelmans skewed data to fit his own ideas in some cases, he is still known as the "father of cryptozoology" for his pioneering work on unknown species.
Inspired partly by Heuvelman's work, scientists Dr. Paul H. LeBlond of the University of British Columbia's Institute of Oceanography and Dr. John Sibert looked at reports of large, unknown creatures inhabiting the waters of British Columbia and found three subtypes that sound much like sea monsters reported around the world. These were repeated in a 1980 book by biologist and author Roy P. Mackal, who cautioned that the three categories may not represent separate species and in fact might simply show differences between male and female:1. A creature with large eyes set laterally on a horse- or camel-shaped head mounted at the end of a long neck. This animal is a fast swimmer, has short, dark-brown fur and no mane. It is probably a mammal and may be related to seals.2. An animal similar to the first type but with small eyes, sometimes described with horns or mane. Both types are not only fast, but also smooth swimmers, submerging vertically as if pulled under.3. A long, serpentine animal, showing loops of its body above water and swimming fast, with much thrashing. Its head is described as sheeplike with small eyes, and it has a dorsal fin running along part of its back.
I CAN IDENTIFY EACH OF THESE CREATURES QUITE EASILY BUT THEY DO NOT ORDINARILY COME SO ASSORTED. USUALLY THE MORE NORMAL ANIMAL-SHAPED CREATURES 1 OR 2 ARE ALSO TRAILING A LENTH OF TAIL OR WAKE WHICH GIVES THE APPEARANCE OF NUMBER 3. IN FACT THE SHEEPLIKE HEAD OF NUMBER 3 IS COMPARABLE TO NUMBER 1 OR 2. IN ASSORTING THESE CATEGORIES OUT, 1 AND 2 ARE FAIRLY SMALL ANIMALS ALTHOUGH THEY CAN BE REPORTED AS BEING LARGER (AGAIN, ACCORDING TO HOW LONG OF A "TAIL" THEY ARE TRAILING.) 1 AND 2 ARE OBVIOUSLY THE SAME SORT OF CREATURE AND THEY CAN BE CHARACTERISED AS "PLAIN" #1 AND "FANCY"#2, WITH THE LATTER EMBELLISHED BY MANE OR BEARD, HORNS OR FLOPPY EARS. BUT HERE IS ANOTHER VIEW FOR CLARIFICATION:http://theworldlink.com/news/local/hunting-sea-beasts/article b27b6ae2-bcee-11e1-ab27-0019bb2963f4.html
HUNTING SEA BEASTS
HOW TO SPOT A SEA MONSTER
2012-06-23T07:00:00Z2012-06-26T08:26:41ZHunting sea beastsDaniel Simmons-Ritchie, The WorldThe WorldJune 23, 2012 7:00 am o Daniel Simmons-Ritchie, The World Sighted a sea beast? Contact the British Columbia Cryptozoology Club: www.bcscc.ca/cadborosaurus.htm
Too much silliness? Read a British paleontologist's article debunking the Cadboro-saurus: blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/04/16/the-cadborosaurus-wars/
COOS BAY - My editor called me insane.
"I need money," I said. "I need a boat."
My editor, as a broad rule, does not believe in sea monsters. Even those, like the Cadborosaurus, that have been seen by over 300 seafarers.
If I'm insane, I argued to my editor on a Friday afternoon in The World office, then I must be in good company.
No more than 60 years ago, a fishing crew watched an unknown creature approach their ship off Cape Arago.
If those men were insane, so too perhaps were the fishermen who recorded a humped beast in Alaskan waters in 2009. Footage later appeared on the Discovery Channel.
If we are insane, then our ringleader must be Paul LeBlond, an emeritus professor from the University of British Columbia. For 50 years, LeBlond has collated hundreds of monster sightings.
Commonly described as a "horse-headed megaserpent," the creature has all the hallmarks of the Loch Ness Monster. In the Pacific Northwest, experts know the beast by a different name: The Cadborosaurus.
Skeptical? LeBlond asks doubters to read about the Cadborosaurus before brushing it aside.
"This isn't like UFOs that are a stretch of the imagination," LeBlond said. "This is a zoological possibility. There are still animals being discovered in the ocean."
In the interest of pushing the zoological frontier, I wanted to charter a boat in search of the Cadborosaurus. My dream was to be the first man to lay claim to the brute.
It was the hunt for the leviathan.
EXPEDITION
I set sail from Charleston Marina on the 14th of June with a five-man crew, pressed between 15-knot winds and the allure of the unknown.
The odds were against us. While the Cadborosaurus is sighted from California to Alaska, it has been more than 50 years since one was spied off Cape Arago.
Among experts, British Columbia is known as ground zero for Cadborosaurus sightings. In the 1930s, the beast was named after its frequent sightings in Cadboro Bay, Vancouver Island.
But even in the heart of "Caddie" country, the serpent is elusive. Despite several expeditions, LeBlond has never seen one in real life. In late May, a National Geographic film crew at his side, the Canadian made another unsuccessful search.
LeBlond didn't rate the chances of my own expedition.
"You would basically keep your eyes open and go to sea without a strong expectation of seeing anything, because the creature is rarely seen," he said.
But he offered some advice: Keep your camera ready. Too many photo opportunities have been missed by distracted observers.
"They stand there ogling the creature and forget about their camera," he said. "One good photo is worth a lot of eyewitness observations."
My crew was up for the challenge. Although my editor was absent, I had a World photographer at my side.
I also had Mel Campbell of the Wild Women of Charleston. When Campbell heard of The World's expedition, she insisted on joining.
"I just have this feeling, a good feeling that today is the day. Don't you?" said Campbell, as our boat churned through the brackish water of the Charleston channel.
And, unlike LeBlond, I had the eagle eyes of Margie Whitmer, the owner of Betty Kay Charters.
Fate had brought me to Whitmer, a red-haired woman with a warm, motherly charm. When I first called, she not only agreed to reserve me her 47-foot boat; she also told me, unexpectedly, that her father had sighted a Cadborosaurus off the coast of Washington.
Margie recounted the story: It was 1956. Whitmer's father was salmon fishing with four friends on a foggy day in Neah Bay. A creature appeared, which he described as "long, dark, bigger than a boat."
"He said, 'I'm never going out again in an open boat, a small boat, for salmon,'" Whitmer said. "It scared him that much."
I asked whether her father might have been joking.
Whitmer shook her head.
"He was just very serious, to the point that you know he was rattled," she said. "And he was a big strong man and nothing could disturb him. But that sure did."
SEA
After 30 minutes, we reached open water. We were alone now, two miles from land, a crouton in a teal soup.
Our boat churned toward Cape Arago lighthouse, our eyes probing the horizon.
An hour passed and our hopes began to fray. No necks. No humps. No fins.
Compounding matters, seasickness began to take hold of me. I could barely hold my harpoon.
We charted a course homeward.
RETURN
As our boat pulled into the marina, a sea lion lazed on the pier. In a search built on hearsay and dreams, its flesh, so blubbery and tangible, taunted me.
Be it Cadboro Bay or Loch Ness, few monsters appear to those who search for them. Most witnesses, like Whitmer's father, stumble on the beast by accident.
Sadly, those sightings are never enough for the insatiable appetite of the scientific record.
Jan Hodder, a Charleston-based marine biologist from Oregon State University, says while little is known about many deep sea creatures, those closer to shore are well-documented.
"Just think of how many people are on the ocean all the time," she said.
A British paleontologist, Darren Naish, is less polite. He says Cadborosaurus mavens, like Paul LeBlond, have created a composite creature based on body parts from different sightings.
"Accounts used to support the reality of 'Cadborosaurus' likely represent a hodge-podge of seal and deer sightings, as well as sightings of other animals and phenomena," Naish wrote in his blog for Scientific American.
These comments are fuel to the fire of unbelief. While I remain empty-handed today, I am cheered by a 1933 editorial in the Victoria Daily Times by Archie Willis, an editor more imaginative than my own.
"Any fool can disbelieve in sea serpents," he wrote.
Reporter Daniel Simmons-Ritchie can be reached at 541-269-1222, ext. 249, or at dritchie@theworldlink.com.
BASICALLY YOU HAVE A SITUATION WITH SIGHTINGS ASSUMED TO BE IN THE SHAPE OF THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE'S SKETCH. CREATURES WITH NECKS 3-6 FEET LONG NEED TO BE SEPARATED OUT FROM THE MORE DEFINITELY LONGNECKED CATEGORY OF CREATURES REPORTED WITH NECKS 6-12 FEET LONG (AND PERHAPS TWICE THAT ACTUALLY.) AND A BODY LENGTH OF 10-20 FEET LONG TO GO WITH THE SHORTER-NECKED CATEGORY BUT 20-40 FEET TO GO ALONG WITH THE LONGER NECKS 12 FEET LONG OR SO. (THAT IS, THE LONGNECKED CREATURES ARE UP TO 30-50 FEET LONG TOTAL, LENGTH OF NECK ASSUMED ABOUT 1/3 TO 1/4 OF TOTAL LENGTH, AND SHOTER-NECKED CREATURES IN THE RANGE OF 10-20 FEET LONG "TOTAL" WITH A HEAD LIKE THAT OF A HORSE OR CAMEL REPORTED ON BOTH CATEGORIES, ONLY A NECK REPORTED AS "HALF AS LONG" IN THE SMALLER CATEGORY. THE LARGER SIZED LONGER NECKED CATEGORY NOW MATCHES WITH TIM DINSDALE'S RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LOCH NESS MONSTER IN ITS BASIC MEASUREMENTS AND PROPORTIONS.)
WE CAN NOW RETURN TO LEBLONDE'S CREATURES LISTED ABOVE.
HIS LONG BODIED CREATURE IS CLEARLY THE SAME AS "THE GREAT SEA SERPENT" OTHERWISE REPORTED WORLD-WIDE IN ALL BODIES OF WATER, FRESHWATER AND SALTWATER, AND DESCRIBED IN SIMILAR TERMS ALL OVER. IT IS ALSO ILLUSTRATED AS THE TAIL SECTION OF THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE'S MONSTER SKETCH
The two kinds of animals identified by LeBlond and pictured at the top of this article are the bull and cow moose, and type 2 is indeed the "Adorned"version with more abundant mane and horns (antlers) but still within the same species, as the original document has stated. a big bull moose can be as much as over 15-16 feet longtip of snout to tip of tail. Those estimates of 20 feet long overall were really quite close
Swimming Cow Moose and Calf
Swimming Bull Moose
Pristichampsus version of Bernard Heuvelmans' MerhorseFrom Deviant art and presuming the "Horns or fins" seen on top of the head along with the maneare actually ears (darkened here) and that the tail is short (Shortened here). The "Beard" corresponds to the "Bell" and overall this is a good match for the proportions of a swimming moose. therer is even the distinct impression that the rear foot has a cloven hoof, but that is probably coincidental. Once again, the lowst sizes of 15-20 feet (often reported as 30 feet long, the "minimum" specified by Heuvelmans but the "maximum" specified by Costello) are also a very good estimate for the actual size of a large moose when seen swimming in the water.
Labels: aliens, cryptozoology, dragons
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Do Aliens Need Gold For Intergalactic Space Travel And Survival
Labels: aliens, astrobiology, extraterrestrial life
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
The Washington National Ufo Sighting Press Conference Part 1
Origin: chupacabra-digest.blogspot.com
Monday, November 3, 2014
An Alien Who Who
Labels: aliens, cropcircle, www.ufos.com
Sunday, November 2, 2014
Astronauta Lunare Crede Agli Alieni I Lunacomplottisti Vanno In Loop Infinito
L'articolo `e stato aggiornato dopo la pubblicazione iniziale.
Edgar Mitchell, uno dei due astronauti che camminarono sulla Luna durante la missione Apollo 14, ha dichiarato di essere "stato informato che siamo stati visitati su questo pianeta e che il fenomeno UFO `e reale". Non solo: dice anche che l'incidente di Roswell `e autentico e che da sessant'anni i governi tengono segreta tutta la faccenda delle visite aliene.
La notizia esplode ovunque in Rete: Slashdot, The Inquirer, News.com.au, Telegraph, BoingBoing, giusto per citare alcuni siti. L'origine della storia `e Kerrang, dove trovate l'audio dell'intervista telefonica a Mitchell.
I lunacomplottisti esultano, perch'e naturalmente credono agli UFO e possono dire "Vedi? Esistono, l'ha detto persino un astronauta".
Ma esultano soltanto per un istante. Perch'e poi si accorgono che quell'astronauta `e una delle persone che loro accusano da quarant'anni di essere uno dei bugiardi traditori che hanno falsificato le missioni lunari, per cui assolutamente non gli possono credere. Oops.
Dai, Ed, che scherzo da prete.
Appena smetto di ridere vi racconto tutta la storia di Ed Mitchell.
2008/07/25: LA TRASCRIZIONE DELLE PAROLE DI MITCHELL
Ecco una stesura veloce del testo integrale delle dichiarazioni dell'astronauta Edgar Mitchell. La trascrizione `e stata realizzata con Dragon Naturally Speaking (io ripetevo le parole dette dagli interlocutori) e poi riveduta a mano un paio di volte. Se trovate refusi o decifrate le parole incomprensibili, avvisatemi via mail o nei commenti.
INTERVISTATORE: "Do you believe in life on other planets?"
MITCHELL: Oh yes, there's not much question at all, but there's life throughout the universe. We're not alone in the universe at all.
I: "You're convinced that we're not alone in the universe?"
M: Oh, I... know for sure we're not alone in the universe. Now, have we been able to identify for sure where the other planets are? No, we have not. Certainly not in our solar system. But they've identified quite a number of planets, now, that very likely could be life-bearing planets, and... I happen to be privileged to know... to have... be in on the fact that we have been visited on this planet and the UFO phenomenon is real, although it's been covered up by our governments for quite a long time.
I: "Wow! Hang on a minute. But this is big. So... I'm... Whoa... This is... All of this is quite a shock to me."
M: Well, I'm sorry, you haven't been reading the papers recently, they're starting to open up quite a bit.
I: "So you're telling me... whoa, this is a lot of information to take on board. Hang on a minute. I mean, listen, I've heard like, you know, crazy UFO nuts tell me this kind of thing before. I've never had Dr. Ed Mitchell, you know, the sixth man to walk on the moon, a respected scientist in his own right, uh, announce to me that we've been... visited by... aliens from... other planets and that they... they definitely are out there, there's no debating it."
M: Well, that's "[incomprensibile]" talked to me, I would have told you about it before.
I: "So... So you... you believe in all of... you believe the whole idea..."
M: Well, no, there's more nonsense out there about this that there is real knowledge, but there is... it is a real phenomenon, and there's quite a few of us... it's been well covered up by all of our governments for the last 60 years or so, but slowly it leaks out and some of us are privileged to have been briefed on some of it. I happen to have grown up in the... I don't even know you... whether you know this place, Roswell, New Mexico, where presumably the Roswell incident of 1947 took place, and I'm quite knowledgeable [incomprensibile] there, since I grew up there, but I've also been in military circles and intelligence circles that knows beneath the surface of what has been, uh... public knowledge, that yes, we have been visited.
I: "So... and... and.. you're serious? You're not going to go, "You know, I was just pulling your leg about that, it's not true"?"
M: [incomprensibile]
I: "I'm just... I was wondering if I'm... I've just stumbled upon... astronaut humour, and in a couple of minutes you're going to go, "I was only pulling your leg"."
M: No, I won't... won't do that.
I: "Wow, so... wow! So.. what... so... I mean, so you've been briefed on the fact that there are... we've been visited."
M: Well, I haven't... briefed is one word for it. I have been involved in... in... much of this work. It's not my main work, it's not my main interest. But I have been deeply involved in certain committees and certain research programs with very credible scientists and intelligence people that do know the real inside story, and I'm... I'm not hesitant to talk about it.
I: "What is the real inside story?"
M: Well, I've just been telling you, we have been visited.
I: "Are they... I mean, are we in regular contact, or was it a one-off crash, or...?"
M: Well, no, there's been quite a few... there's quite a bit of contact going on, I can't tell you because I don't know all the extent of it, I don't know all the inside details because that isn't my really main interest, but the fact that we have been visited, the Roswell crash was real and a numbers... number of other contacts have been real and ongoing. Uh, it's pretty well known for... to those of us who have... been briefed and been close to the subject matter.
I: "So why is it being covered up then? Why is it that it's not mainstream?"
M: Well, the reason for that goes back to the main incidents that really started taking place after World War II, when in the United States at least, I can't speak for European governments or the South American governments, all of them have recently started opening their files, and most... I mean, it's been opened, this is starting to open up, and read the Internet or look at... look at some of the press, the international press, you get, start to get stories coming out now. But...
I: "I've... I've... I've had people on the show telling me that we're mount-...that... that governments are mounting up towards disclosure, towards saying that this is the case. Do you think it'll be the case that there will be an actual disclosure on this, maybe this year, that the governments will come out?"
M: I don't know whether it will be this year in the United States, but certainly we 've already had it in the last few years from the Belgian government, the French government, the Brazilian government, the Mexican government, they've opened their files and admitted that they had the files.
I: "Okay, right, let me get my head together. Okay, listen, here's what I now. I've had people on the show talking about the fact that the Catholic Church has said, belief in life on other planets doesn't compromise your Catholicism."
M: Of course, that just happened recently in association with a major release, I believe, of the British government...some of the British government files, they weren't their deepest files, but some files were released.
I: "Yep, what's happening is at the moment, over the next four years, all the UFO files here in the UK are being released. Do you think it's the case we are ramping up towards maybe the UK admitting?"
M: Well, I can't say how fast it's going to happen, but certainly the public awareness of it... uh... is increasing, public acceptance is increasing. The amount of... misinformation... covert and actual attempts to cover up, seem to be decreasing. I think we're headed toward... real disclosure in some very serious organisations, uh, moving in that direction.
I: "What do you... you've had a long time to think about this. What you think the impact will be on the world when it's finally mainstream news that there are alien beings that live outside this planet?"
M: Well, I think at this point it's probably "Ho-hum, so what's new?" I think that certainly in the United States well over 70% of the people now accept this as fact although they may not... they do not know... all the correct story, they do know that there has been, or accept the fact, there has been visitation, UFOs in the skies all the time that are very likely alien craft. Now, not all of them are, I suspect some of them are home-grown. I suspect that in the last 60 years or so, that there has been some, uh, back-engineering and the creation of this type of equipment that is not nearly as sophisticated, yet, as what the apparent visitors have.
I: "So... as part of this... I mean, as part of you knowing about this and also going public with it, are you worried for your own safety with this kind of stuff or are you convinced that" [incomprensibile]"?"
M: Oh, I think that those days are gone. There used to be a concern among the people on the inside, but I don't think they're knocking anybody off for that any more or, uh, doing drastic things to them.
I: "What do you think the intent of the aliens is? Is it hostile or peaceful?"
M: No no no, it's not hostile, it's pretty obvious that if it were hostile, we would've been gone by now.
I: "Really"?
M: We could have been. We had no defense, if that's what their real intent was.
I: "And what... are we talking... What do they look like, are we talking, like, you know, the traditional sort of...?"
M: You've seen some of the pictures, uh... the pictures that I know of, some of them are... uh... are these little.. little people look strange... that look strange to us. As far as I know from my... from my, uh, contacts that have had contact, that looks... is pretty accurate.
I: "Wow! Do you think other people who are involved in the moon landings know about this?"
M: Some of them do. But again, it's like other people, if you're interested enough to dig into it and want to know about it, you can know about it.
I: "Because... uh, listen, I don't want... I know you're a busy guy and I know there's other people..."
M: Yeah, this phone that... is not leaving me alone, this other phone is ringing all the time, and... I'm by myself here at the moment.
I: "I've... This has been... easily one of the most significant conversations in my life. Unbelievable. Uh, Uh... just... I want to thank you for joining us, and, uh, Doctor Ed Mitchell, that's inc... Listen, you're a friend of the show, if you want to accept that friendship and... and wow, what an incredible conversation. Listen man, thanks for joining" [troncato dalla fine della registrazione, presumo "us"]
2008/07/29
In sintesi, Mitchell non dice di aver avuto contatti diretti con alieni o veicoli alieni, ma di averne saputo attraverso le parole di altri. La sua accusa ai governi di aver cospirato per tenere segreta la verit`a `e basata soltanto su vaghe dicerie. Quello che colpisce `e che Mitchell annuncia una delle notizie pi`u importanti della storia (il contatto con altre civilt`a) e poi la liquida dicendo che "non `e il mio interesse principale". Come sarebbe a dire? Cos'altro ci pu`o mai essere di pi`u "principale" e di pi`u interessante rispetto a una notizia del genere?
Mitchell non ha prove e non fa nomi di testimoni n'e indica circostanze precise (salvo dire che l'incidente di Roswell del 1947 `e "autentico"). Un po' poco, per un'affermazione cos`i straordinaria.
Le dichiarazioni di Mitchell vanno calate nel contesto. Mitchell, come notano i commenti qui sotto, `e ben conosciuto da tempo per le sue affermazioni riguardanti i poteri paranormali: condusse privatamente degli esperimenti di telepatia durante la sua missione nel 1971. La cosa non deve stupire, perch'e era un periodo nel quale la parapsicologia era in auge. Qui trovate un articolo del 2003 che racconta in dettaglio gli esperimenti e i rapporti di Mitchell con il presunto sensitivo Uri Geller e offre vari esempi delle concezioni mistiche decisamente originali di Mitchell.
Gi`a nel 1973 aveva fondato l'Institute of Noetic Sciences per indagare sui fenomeni paranormali, e afferma (senza prove) di essere stato guarito dal cancro ai reni da un guaritore fra il 2003 e il 2004.
In altre parole: Mitchell `e stato un grande astronauta che ha sempre albergato idee trascendentali piuttosto estreme. E' perfettamente plausibile che un'esperienza intensissima come il viaggio nello spazio per sbarcare sul suolo di un altro corpo celeste abbia stimolato ulteriormente queste idee: chi non sarebbe spinto a pensieri mistici di fronte alla visione di tutto il nostro pianeta tanto lontano da poterlo coprire con il proprio pollice?
Non siamo dunque di fronte a uno scettico che presenta dei fatti concreti, ma a una persona con decenni di inclinazioni mistiche che presenta delle dicerie. Di conseguenza `e d'obbligo molta cautela prima di prendere per buone certe affermazioni.
Quest'episodio, con le reazioni istintive che ha provocato in molti, `e un caso classico della fallacia del cosiddetto "principio d'autorit`a": ci viene naturale fidarci delle persone che hanno ricoperto ruoli importanti e autorevoli, anche quando parlano di cose che stanno al di fuori della loro sfera di competenza. Mitchell `e stato un astronauta quarant'anni fa: ha imparato a fare cose tecniche assolutamente straordinarie, come pilotare il modulo lunare. Ma questo non gli conferisce competenze o autorevolezza in altri settori, come la parapsicologia, verso i quali anzi chi ha una preparazione scientifica `e particolarmente vulnerabile: il caso dei fisici Russell Targ e Harold Puthoff, gabbati dai giochi di prestigio di Uri Geller negli anni Settanta del secolo scorso, fece storia in questo senso.Scritto da Paolo Attivissimo per il blog Il Disinformatico. Ripubblicabile liberamente se viene inclusa questa dicitura (dettagli). Sono ben accette le donazioni Paypal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
